Londoners die for want of a gun NOLAN FINLEY August 21, 2011
Defenders of the Second Amendment couldn't have asked for a greater
gift than the spectacle of unarmed policemen and defenseless citizens
standing by helplessly while rampaging hordes of youths burned London and
beat up and murdered innocent residents. Europhiles endlessly remind us of the superiority, compassion and
refinement of the European social democracies. But the anarchy that raged in England couldn't happen in America. At
least not in my neighborhood, where every third house contains a hunter
with a gun safe full of pistols, shotguns and rifles. We've ceded many or our liberties to the government, but so far we've
hung on to the right to defend ourselves and protect our families and
homes. We pay our cops to do the same. Not so in England. Police there are armed with little more than a smile. As demonstrated
by the recent riots, they are virtually powerless to counter violence. Even such nonlethal responses as water cannons and rubber bullets are
debated in Parliament. A shocking column last week in the Wall Street Journal by law professor
Joyce Lee Malcolm detailed the ridiculous lengths to which the Brits have
gone to level the playing field between criminals and law-abiding
citizens. It's part of the American DNA that if hit, you have the right to hit
back. But in England, crime targets risk prison for killing or injuring an
attacker. Homeowners have been charged with murder for killing an
intruder. Burglars who hurt themselves breaking into a house can sue the
owner. Police called to crimes in progress can do little but shrug and wait
until the carnage is complete to dust off the victim. We have our flaws in America. But we have the common sense to recognize
the difference between those who obey the law and those who break it. Although a few places, most notably Washington D.C., have stripped
their citizens of the best means of self defense, for the most part
responsible gun ownership is still an acknowledged right. Londoners had little more than cricket bats and frying pans to fend off
the marauders. Private gun ownership is limited. It's even illegal to have
a knife with a blade longer than three inches. The gun-phobic in this country blame widespread legal gun ownership for
violent crime. But in England, where only the bad guys have guns, crimes committed
with handguns have increased 40 percent since they were banned in
1997. In the 10 years since Michigan liberalized its concealed carry law,
more than a quarter million residents have received weapons permits,
without the predicted rise in gun violence. But there has been an increase in the number of citizens trained and
prepared to protect their communities from falling into anarchy.
|