The Bill of Rights:
A BRIEF HISTORY
"[A] bill of rights is what the people are
entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just
government should refuse." --- Thomas Jefferson December 20, 1787
In the summer of 1787, delegates from the 13 states convened
in Philadelphia and drafted a remarkable blueprint for self-government -- the Constitution
of the United States. The first draft set up a system of checks and balances that included
a strong executive branch, a representative legislature and a federal judiciary.
The Constitution was remarkable, but deeply flawed. For one
thing, it did not include a specific declaration – or bill – of individual
rights. It specified what the government could do but did not say what it could not
do. For another, it did not apply to everyone. The "consent of the
governed" meant propertied white men only.
The absence of a "bill of rights" turned out to be
an obstacle to the Constitution's ratification by the states. It would take four more
years of intense debate before the new government's form would be resolved. The
Federalists opposed including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. The
Anti-Federalists, who were afraid of a strong centralized government, refused to support
the Constitution without one.
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS ARE THE OLDEST AND
MOST TRADITIONAL OF AMERICAN VALUES
|
In the end, popular sentiment was decisive. Recently freed
from the despotic English monarchy, the American people wanted strong guarantees that the
new government would not trample upon their newly won freedoms of speech, press and
religion, nor upon their right to be free from warrantless searches and seizures. So, the
Constitution's framers heeded Thomas Jefferson who argued: "A bill of rights is what
the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and
what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference."
The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and
drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments
became the law of the land.
Early American mistrust of government power came from the
colonial experience itself. Most historians believe that the pivotal event was the Stamp
Act, passed by the English Parliament in 1765. Taxes were imposed on every legal and
business document. Newspapers, books and pamphlets were also taxed. Even more than the
taxes themselves, the Americans resented the fact that they were imposed by a distant
government in which they were not represented. And they were further enraged by the ways
in which the Stamp Act was enforced.
Armed with "writs of assistance" issued by
Parliament, British customs inspectors entered people's homes even if they had no evidence
of a Stamp Act violation, and ransacked the people's belongings in search of contraband.
The colonialists came to hate these "warrantless" searches and they became a
rallying point for opposition to British rule.
From these experiences came a uniquely American view of
power and liberty as natural enemies. The nation's founders believed that containing the
government's power and protecting liberty was their most important task, and declared a
new purpose for government: the protection of individual rights.
The protection of rights was not the government's only
purpose. It was still expected to protect the community against foreign and domestic
threats, to ensure economic growth, and to conduct foreign affairs. It was not, however,
the government's job to tell people how to live their lives, what religion to believe in,
or what to write about in a pamphlet or newspaper. In this sense, the idea of individual
rights is the oldest and most traditional of American values.
"CERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS"
|
Democracy and liberty are often thought to be the same
thing, but they are not. Democracy means that people ought to be able to vote for
public officials in fair elections, and make most political decisions by majority rule. Liberty,
on the other hand, means that even in a democracy, individuals have rights that no
majority should be able to take away.
The rights that the Constitution's framers wanted to protect
from government abuse were referred to in the Declaration of Independence as
"unalienable rights." They were also called "natural" rights, and to
James Madison, they were "the great rights of mankind." Although it is commonly
thought that we are entitled to free speech because the First Amendment gives it to us,
this country's original citizens believed that as human beings, they were entitled to free
speech, and they invented the First Amendment in order to protect it. The entire Bill of
Rights was created to protect rights the original citizens believed were naturally theirs,
including:
- FREEDOM OF RELIGION –
- The right to exercise one's own religion, or no religion,
free from any government influence or compulsion .
- FREEDOM OF SPEECH, PRESS, PETITION & ASSEMBLY–
- Even unpopular expression is protected from government
suppression or censorship .
- PRIVACY –
- The right to be free of unwarranted and unwanted government
intrusion into one's personal and private affairs, papers, and possessions.
- DUE PROCESS OF LAW –
- The right to be treated fairly by the government whenever the
loss of liberty or property is at stake.
- EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW –
- The right to be treated equally before the law, regardless of
social status .
"AN IMPENETRABLE BULWARK" OF
LIBERTY
|
The Bill of Rights established soaring principles that
guaranteed the most fundamental rights in very general terms. But from the beginning, real
live cases arose that raised difficult questions about how, and even if, the Bill of
Rights would be applied. Before the paper rights could become actual rights, someone had
to interpret what the language of the Bill of Rights meant in specific situations. Who
would be the final arbiter of how the Constitution should be applied?
At first, the answer was unclear. Thomas Jefferson thought
that the federal judiciary should have that power; James Madison agreed that a system of
independent courts would be "an impenetrable bulwark" of liberty. But the
Constitution did not make this explicit, and the issue would not be resolved until 1803.
That year, for the first time, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down an act of Congress as
unconstitutional in a case called Marbury v. Madison. Although the facts of this
case were fairly mundane (a dispute over the Secretary of State's refusal to commission
four judges appointed by the Senate), the principle it established – that the Supreme
Court had the power to nullify acts of Congress that violated the Constitution –
turned out to be the key to the development and protection of most of the rights Americans
enjoy today. According to one eminent legal scholar, the independent judiciary was
"America's most distinctive contribution to constitutionalism."
The judicial branch of the new government was different from
the legislative and executive branches in one very important respect: the courts did not
have the power to initiate action by themselves. Congress could pass laws and the
President could issue executive orders, but courts could not review these actions on their
own initiative. Courts had to wait until a dispute – a "case or
controversy" – broke out between real people who had something to gain or lose
by the outcome. And as it turned out, the people whose rights were most vulnerable to
governmental abuse had least capacity to sue.
Thus, although the power of judicial review was established
in 1803, more than a century would pass before the Supreme Court even had many
opportunities to protect individual rights. For 130 years after ratification, the most
notable thing about the Bill of Rights was its almost total lack of implementation by the
courts. By the beginning of the 20th century, racial segregation was legal and pervaded
all aspects of American society. Sex discrimination was firmly institutionalized and
workers were arrested for labor union activities. Legal immigrants were deported for their
political views, the police used physical coercion to extract confessions from criminal
suspects, and members of minority religions were victims of persecution. As late as 1920,
the U.S. Supreme Court had never once struck down any law or governmental action on First
Amendment grounds.
The most common constitutional violations went unchallenged
because the people whose rights were most often denied were precisely those members of
society who were least aware of their rights and least able to afford a lawyer. They had
no access to those impenetrable bulwarks of liberty – the courts. The Bill of Rights
was like an engine no one knew how to start.
In 1920, a small group of visionaries came together to
discuss how to start the engine. Led by Roger Baldwin, a social worker and labor activist,
the group included Crystal Eastman, Albert DeSilver, Jane Addams, Felix Frankfurter, Helen
Keller and Arthur Garfield Hayes. They formed the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
and dedicated themselves to holding the government to the Bill of Rights' promises.
The ACLU, the NAACP, founded in 1909, and labor unions,
whose very right to exist had not yet been recognized by the courts, began to challenge
constitutional violations in court on behalf of those who had been previously shut out.
This was the beginning of what has come to be known as public interest law. They provided
the missing ingredient that made our constitutional system and Bill of Rights finally
work.
Although they had few early victories, these organizations
began to create a body of law that made First Amendment freedoms, privacy rights, and the
principles of equality and fundamental fairness come alive. Gradually, the Bill of Rights
was transformed from a "parchment barrier" to a protective wall that
increasingly shielded each individual's unalienable rights from the reach of government.
Enormous progress was made between 1954 and 1973, when many
rights long dormant became enforceable. Today, those achievements are being heavily
challenged by a movement dedicated to rolling back the reach and effectiveness of the Bill
of Rights and to undermining the independence of our courts.
The development of the Bill of Rights was a pivotal event in
the long story of liberty, but it is a story that is still unfolding.
RIGHTS, BUT NOT FOR EVERYBODY
The Bill of Rights seemed to be written in broad language
that excluded no one, but in fact, it was not intended to protect all the people –
whole groups were left out. Women were second-class citizens, essentially the property of
their husbands, unable even to vote until 1920, when the 19th Amendment was passed and
ratified.
Native Americans were entirely outside the constitutional
system, defined as an alien people in their own land. They were governed not by ordinary
American laws, but by federal treaties and statutes that stripped tribes of most of their
land and much of their autonomy. The Bill of Rights was in force for nearly 135 years
before Congress granted Native Americans U.S. citizenship.
And it was well understood that there was a "race
exception" to the Constitution. Slavery was this country's original sin. For the
first 78 years after it was ratified, the Constitution protected slavery and legalized
racial subordination. Instead of constitutional rights, slaves were governed by
"slave codes" that controlled every aspect of their lives. They had no access to
the rule of law: they could not go to court, make contracts, or own any property. They
could be whipped, branded, imprisoned without trial, and hanged. In short, as one infamous
Supreme Court opinion declared: "Blacks had no rights which the white man was bound
to respect."
It would take years of struggle and a bloody civil war
before additional amendments to the Constitution were passed, giving slaves and their
descendants the full rights of citizenship – at least on paper:
 | The 13th Amendment abolished slavery;
|
| The 14th Amendment guaranteed to African Americans
the rights of due process and equal protection
of the law; |
| The 15th Amendment gave them the right to vote
|
But it would take a century more of struggle before these
rights were effectively enforced.
|
-
- SOURCE:
- This briefing paper was adapted from "The Birth of the
Bill of Rights" in Visions of Liberty by Ira Glasser (Arcade
Publishing). Copies may be purchased through ACLU Publications at 800-775-ACLU or on
our web site at <http://www.aclu.org>.
A C L U – American
Civil Liberties Union
125 Broad Street, 18th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10004-2400
Peoples Rights Return
Top Return